<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Baja Democrats - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-1bdec730" type="application/json"/><link>http://bajademocrats.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://bajademocrats.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:52:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Much Ado About Nothing</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/15/much-ado-about-nothing-2/#comment-900738516</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ABC NEWS......now back to the shell game. Or shill game.... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">urbanviking</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:52:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Much Ado About Nothing</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/15/much-ado-about-nothing-2/#comment-900280767</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Too bad you apparently reply on things like Fox "News" for your information. It was not the acting commissioner who was due to step down next month. That was the head of the tax exempt division, who also resigned. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BajaDemocrats</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 09:10:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Much Ado About Nothing</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/15/much-ado-about-nothing-2/#comment-899806819</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Too bad the real culprit has moved on to head up the IRS Obamacare office and the acting commissioner was due to leave next month anyway. Quite a shell game.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">urbanviking</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:27:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Much Ado About Nothing</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/15/much-ado-about-nothing-2/#comment-899729155</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Pinar, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You said it best when you said..."politicians - never change". At the risk of appearing nothing more than brazenly antagonistic, I will suggest that political shills are the same. Benghazi is a big deal. The person with whom the ultimate responsibility rests has yet to accept it. And the luxuriantly blooming scandals elsewhere? Priceless. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now that you mention Clinton....who was not a total idiot on the subject of economics compared to our present monarch-wannabe. But Clinton really blew it in the Balkans. Libya? Who in their right mind would hire jihadi-lights to defend us from real jihadis? I am sorry for the casualties that were suffered that day. But (we) have been getting a lot wrong and trying to dodge the rap for a long time. Will anyone in this administration come out and say he or she was "The Decider"? Who will take the rap now? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A note to teknik, it is supremely hypocritical of you to jab the GOP for "subsidizing corporate America". Do you read?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">urbanviking</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 17:41:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Much Ado About Nothing</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/15/much-ado-about-nothing-2/#comment-899602223</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This president says one thing and does the opposite.  This is the climate created by him in "MY" administration.  No mystery that his faithful minions at the IRS, State and Justice, EPA, etc etc do as their leader has done from the beginning of "MY" administration.  Stonewall. Delay. Destroy "MY" enemies.  Much ado about nothing but the "Chicago way".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wes Fly</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 15:16:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Much Ado About Nothing</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/15/much-ado-about-nothing-2/#comment-899559124</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wait, so we should just let the GOP propaganda machine waste more money on inquiries?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;why is it the GOP loves Turing tax dollars over to lawyers?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;there's something wrong with government subsidizing corporate America but the GOP is all about it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;wake up, you are letting them rob us.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">teknik1200</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 14:26:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Much Ado About Nothing</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/15/much-ado-about-nothing-2/#comment-899557935</link><description>&lt;p&gt;they have to firs know about what happened i watergate, none of them do so its easy for the m to exagrate the scenario.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;much ado about nothing is correct.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;but, have you ever noticed the way tea party types are all about profiling Latinos here in AZ?  once the shoe is on the other foot they sure are quick cry foul.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">teknik1200</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 14:25:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Much Ado About Nothing</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/15/much-ado-about-nothing-2/#comment-898749091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your title pretty much sums up what you wrote.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fraser007</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:53:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Much Ado About Nothing</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/15/much-ado-about-nothing-2/#comment-898661974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It led to Nixon being forced from office to avoid being impeached, because of Nixon's arrogance, stupidity, and dishonesty. He had no knowledge in advance of the break-in, he was only guilty of obstruction of justice - within days of the break-in he  ordered Chief of Staff Haldeman to have the CIA block the FBI's investigation into funding for the burglary, as they knew it led straight to senior Nixon aides. And that conversation was recorded on the White House video taping system.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There's nothing to hide here, and everything will be fully investigated.A little while ago President Obama accepted the resignation of the acting IRS commissioner, that resignation was request by Treasury Secretary Lew.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BajaDemocrats</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 19:34:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Much Ado About Nothing</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/15/much-ado-about-nothing-2/#comment-898621184</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Watergate started as a third-rate burglary...and look where it led!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cafe con Leche GOP</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:46:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our very own Jeff Flake &amp;#8211; the most unpopular Senator in the country UPDATED</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/01/our-very-own-jeff-flake-the-most-unpopular-senator-in-the-country/#comment-896773891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Then how would they find you in their database? Through a registry is how.Then once you have violated your right to own a firearm how would they know you have a gun so they can confiscate it? Through a registry is how.California and New York whhere people are having their firearms confiscated shows perfectly well how they would setup and use a registry..because they have and are.Otherwise they would not be confiscating weapons at the moment because there would be no registry and they would not know who has what firearms.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 01:23:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our very own Jeff Flake &amp;#8211; the most unpopular Senator in the country UPDATED</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/01/our-very-own-jeff-flake-the-most-unpopular-senator-in-the-country/#comment-888377680</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Farmer-Girl...you are so right on this. Its not the gun issue its the Gang of 8 sell out of the United States. Check out todays Az Daily Star article on what letting these illegals become legal will do for the USA. I think idiots like Flake and Mccain just sent millions more to the right. (Thank God!).What they have done is close to treason.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fraser007</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:20:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our very own Jeff Flake &amp;#8211; the most unpopular Senator in the country UPDATED</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/01/our-very-own-jeff-flake-the-most-unpopular-senator-in-the-country/#comment-888139435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't forget "never let a crisis go to waste". Even if you use dead children and their parents as a backdrop for "your" agenda. Would "anyone" let a president use your dead children as a backdrop or a wounded and cripled congresswoman, or people going to a movie, or an attack on our embasey, (just a stupid clip on internet) or someone elses fault. I guess if you just lie or blame someone else or some group or cercomstance or dead children  and the "ignoranti" will vote you in office. Oh, I forget. The buck no longer stops at 16000 Penn. Ave.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terry L</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 09:18:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our very own Jeff Flake &amp;#8211; the most unpopular Senator in the country UPDATED</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/01/our-very-own-jeff-flake-the-most-unpopular-senator-in-the-country/#comment-883050615</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're right. Apparently the 90% claim was in the HuffPo or some other place I was reading along with your commentary. My apologies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;PS - I don't use terms like "libtard."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sandhillguy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 01:45:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our very own Jeff Flake &amp;#8211; the most unpopular Senator in the country UPDATED</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/01/our-very-own-jeff-flake-the-most-unpopular-senator-in-the-country/#comment-882996837</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These people who are against background checks at gun shows don't want the government keeping track of their gun ownership.  They believe the government will come knocking on their doors some day to take back those guns.  They are crazy.  And they own guns.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amy Bee</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 23:24:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our very own Jeff Flake &amp;#8211; the most unpopular Senator in the country UPDATED</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/01/our-very-own-jeff-flake-the-most-unpopular-senator-in-the-country/#comment-882996242</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He shot her with his finger?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amy Bee</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 23:23:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our very own Jeff Flake &amp;#8211; the most unpopular Senator in the country UPDATED</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/01/our-very-own-jeff-flake-the-most-unpopular-senator-in-the-country/#comment-882921223</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did you even read the article before deciding it was just another anti-gun libtard rant? I never made any 90% claim, I cited only polls in Arizona, where 70% support expanded background checks and only 26% oppose it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BajaDemocrats</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 20:57:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our very own Jeff Flake &amp;#8211; the most unpopular Senator in the country UPDATED</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/01/our-very-own-jeff-flake-the-most-unpopular-senator-in-the-country/#comment-882875139</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I posted this as a reply, which only served to bury it. So, with apologies, here it is again:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"Guns" is a noun, not an issue. Allowing dangerous people to remain on the loose is an issue. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You liberals all all about labels and spin; "Sensible" refers to anything you believe in, right? So that anybody who opposes you is by definition not sensible.  Sadly, the tactic works on the ignoranti, which explains why we have the  current occupant as president.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sandhillguy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 19:42:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our very own Jeff Flake &amp;#8211; the most unpopular Senator in the country UPDATED</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/01/our-very-own-jeff-flake-the-most-unpopular-senator-in-the-country/#comment-882817617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;B.S. story. from gun control libtards&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyBinGA</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:52:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our very own Jeff Flake &amp;#8211; the most unpopular Senator in the country UPDATED</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/01/our-very-own-jeff-flake-the-most-unpopular-senator-in-the-country/#comment-882812274</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Jeff Flake being on the wrong side of immigration reform is the real issue that tanked his approval rating. I agree that Jeff is the nation's worst senator and I will be working hard to make sure he only serves one term. Arizona deserves far better than Jeff Flake.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farmer_Girl</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:46:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our very own Jeff Flake &amp;#8211; the most unpopular Senator in the country UPDATED</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/01/our-very-own-jeff-flake-the-most-unpopular-senator-in-the-country/#comment-882799493</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Would you please cite a source for the 90% claim? Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sandhillguy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:34:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our very own Jeff Flake &amp;#8211; the most unpopular Senator in the country UPDATED</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/01/our-very-own-jeff-flake-the-most-unpopular-senator-in-the-country/#comment-882798456</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Guns" is a noun, not an issue. Allowing dangerous people to remain on the loose is an issue. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You liberals all all about labels and spin; "Sensible" refers to anything you believe in, right? So that anybody who opposes you is by definition not sensible.  Sadly, the tactic works on the ignoranti, which explains why we have the  current occupant as president.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sandhillguy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:32:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our very own Jeff Flake &amp;#8211; the most unpopular Senator in the country UPDATED</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/01/our-very-own-jeff-flake-the-most-unpopular-senator-in-the-country/#comment-882775211</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The "national register of guns" is a big lie told by the NRA and re-told by the right wing. The Manchin-Toomey background check law explicitly prohibits the creation of a national gun registry in not one, not two, but three separate places. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Section 102:"Congress supports and reaffirms the existing prohibition on a national firearms registry."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Section 103:"Nothing in this title, or any amendment made by this title, shall be construed to allow the establishment, directly or indirectly, of a Federal firearms registry."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And section 122 amends Section 923 of title 18 of the U.S. Code by barring the attorney general from consolidating or centralizing any of the records generated from background checks. A 15-year jail sentence and monetary fines would apply to any official creating or attempting to create a national gun registry.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm not saying you're lying, I'm saying you apparently fell victim to hearing the lie. Here, you can read the bill yourself at:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/R?r113:FLD001:S02598" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Flake never said anything about any concerns about the law creating a national gun registry, because he knows it does not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BajaDemocrats</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:10:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our very own Jeff Flake &amp;#8211; the most unpopular Senator in the country UPDATED</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/01/our-very-own-jeff-flake-the-most-unpopular-senator-in-the-country/#comment-882254402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Part of Obamas plan was a national regester of guns??? Who says who is a lunatic (Doctor-Patieint rights), terrorist, etc, (what are the perimaters???). Most of us want to up-date the existing checks with perimaters.Note; the checks we have now are not followed up by the justice department against those that fail the checks. (less than 3%). Is this a slipery slope?? We need more answers before we jump into more regulations because of "current events". I understand this is Sen. Flakes concern. If Gabby was stabbed by a knife do we regulate knifes?? We prosicute people who commit crimes. It is your right to voice your openion and mine also. Thanks to the first amendment. The second is to keep the first. Keep up your thoughts, I enjoy people like you that speak up. Especially those that use their right to vote.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terry L</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 09:08:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our very own Jeff Flake &amp;#8211; the most unpopular Senator in the country UPDATED</title><link>http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2013/05/01/our-very-own-jeff-flake-the-most-unpopular-senator-in-the-country/#comment-882243851</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We already have had background checks on purchases of guns from licensed gun dealers, and the courts and overwhelming majority of citizens and gun owners do not believe that infringes on the 2nd Amendment. So how is expanding those checks to close the glaring loophole of gun "shows" turning your back on the 2nd Amendment? One can be on the terrorist watch list and be prevented from flying on a plane and many other things, but that same person can buy all the guns &amp;amp; ammo he wants at a gun 'show' with no questions asked. Does that make any sense at all?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BajaDemocrats</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 08:52:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>